Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 4,641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2012, 2:07 pm
Posted by Greg MersolThe United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia has issued a very good decision for employers opposing conditional certification of FLSA minimum wage and overtime cases. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
But see contra United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:52 am
United Fruit & Produce, 242 B.R. 295, 301. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 6:46 am
So ruled the magistrate in United Food & Commercial Workers, Local 7 v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:15 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:10 am
(citing Sparkman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:34 am
The generic defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the United States Supreme Court held in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:29 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:58 pm
No donation ever took place as the timeshare units never existed and no trust was settled. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 5:12 am
He can be reached at 216.685.1062 and dbrown@weltman.com. ________________________________________ [1] Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners’ Assoc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:40 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 12:58 pm
There are state specific laws on the subject which varies from state to state. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:35 am
… The only difference is that the Edwards complaint addresses all persons or entities residing in Colorado, whereas the Walewski complaint addresses all persons or entities residing in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
State of California and Syncora Guarantee Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:19 am
In Felder v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 4:24 am
Exclusive remedy is alive and well on both coasts of the United States.In New York, the state's Appellate Division, 2nd Department, ruled that an employer that violated federal immigration law by hiring two undocumented aliens did not lose its exclusive remedy protection from claims filed by those workers after they were injured at work.In New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens v. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 7:19 am
In Reyes v Jeffcoat, 2012 WL 4009641 (D.S.C.) [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 3:00 pm
However, in 1983, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rendered its decision in UAW v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
Sheriff’s Office v. [read post]
