Search for: "United States v. California" Results 2961 - 2980 of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
While the District Court agreed that "the government 'may not misuse its zoning powers to reduce the expense of a subsequent condemnation,'" slip op. at 7, the court relied on California v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by russell
But, they are required by law to do so under a United States Supreme Court case, Brady v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:00 am by Eliot Kim
United States for being unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
  He was found a little over a week later in the United States near the Calexico, California, port of entry, and this time charged with illegal reentry. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm by Ilya Somin
But California's position was greatly strengthened by the Supreme Court's May 2018 ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm by Bill Raftery
We have been taught since grade school (hopefully) that there are “three branches of government” in the United States: the legislative, executive, and judicial. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am by Kent Scheidegger
Finally, it appears that the United States Supreme Court is prepared to clean up one of the messier areas of its jurisprudence, the question of when a state procedural default rule is an "adequate" ground for decision, precluding federal review of the underlying question. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:03 am
Times, Oct. 18, 2007, (last visited October 22, 2007).[4] Id.[5] Id.[6] United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm by Mike
Judge Susan Illston stated this was not a problem because the court could "group[] similar state laws together and apply[] them as a unit. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:44 pm by The Complex Litigator
United States District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel (Northern District of California) offered some interesting comments, but no clear solutions, to the puzzle posed by litigation of PAGA claims as representative actions. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:29 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The decision of the NIGC, the federal agency charged with approving and disapproving management contracts under IGRA, is binding on lower courts unless successfully challenged in a United States District Court. [read post]