Search for: "United States v. Cores" Results 2961 - 2980 of 4,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 12:43 pm by Wells Bennett
  At argument on the preliminary injunction, Hedges testified that he was familiar with the AUMF, which – in his view – authorized detention of “enemy combatants on foreign soil that are engaged in direct hostilities with the United States and are linked directly with those who carried out the attacks of 9/11. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Instead, according to the court, The United States Supreme Court has never held that rape-shield statutes do not represent a legitimate state interest, nor has it ever held that highly probative evidence will necessarily outweigh that interest. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:19 am by SHG
Not because seven months is such a big deal, but because her decision in Hedges v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
 On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
13 May 2012, 11:30 pm by Stan
Regarding trading rights, the United States seeks consultations on various Chinese measures that reserve, to certain Chinese state-designated and wholly or partially state-owned enterprises, the right to import films for theatrical release, audiovisual home entertainment products, sound recordings and publications; Regarding distribution services, the United States seeks consultations on various Chinese measures that impose market access… [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:22 am by Thomas Kaufman
  This is separate from the issue pending before the United States Supreme Court in Christopher v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:16 am
She originally sued drug manufacturer Mutual Pharmaceutical Company in New Hampshire state court, and after removal to federal court and pretrial motions, her core claim became one for defective design. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:28 am by Linda McClain
" This stands in sharp contrast to a basic tenet of family law in the United States: that civil marriage is a state-created institution and that the state is a third party to every marriage and divorce. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164], in which the High Court was considering a similar question as to whether the Election Tribunal constituted under the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, had the power to pass an injunction so as to restrain an elected representative from assuming office pending adjudication of an election petition filed against him. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:17 am by Dan Markel
Sawyer,[1] to have helped ensure submission of the United States’ amicus brief in Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Carpenter, Texas Wesleyan School of Law (United States) Christine Haight Farley, American University, Washington College of Law (United States) Are there any outer limits? [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:26 am by Benjamin Wittes
Next in our challenge-chat rotation: Cheryl Bormann—whose challenge to prosecutors’ sartorial choices has not endeared her to the press core. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
According to the court’s opinion, this was a result largely dictated by Missouri v. [read post]