Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 2961 - 2980 of 9,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm by Susan C. Morse
§ 1503,  which was limited with a pending-proceeding requirement in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Dan Stein
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:39 am
On June 8, 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued another 5-4 opinion. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
Since immigrating to the United States in 1991, Plaintiff has sued over twenty business entities for alleged accessibility violations, and, in all (but one) of those cases, he never returned to the establishment he sued after settling the case and obtaining a cash payment. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
Representing the United States as amicus curiae, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole A. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
And, although Chief Justice John Roberts joined the majority opinions in both District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am by Adam Gillette
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
Forbes previews United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
Conventional wisdom says that the current iteration of the United States Supreme Court is pro-business. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:36 am by SHG
United States, they’ve got some decisions to make. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm by Lisa McElroy
Last week at the Supreme Court of the United States was certainly a huge one, especially given the decision in Citizens United. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Thomas Porteous, Jr., while a Federal judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge, as follows: Judge Porteous, while presiding as a United States district judge in Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:01 am by Howard Bashman
Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court in part in United States v. [read post]