Search for: "United States v. Sessions"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 3,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:41 am
” He said, “Taney is making the case that Black people who were enslaved were never part of the people of the United States and could never be citizens. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
Did you understand the “he,” in that email, to refer to the President of the United States? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
What are we to make of a state that enacts an obviously unconstitutional law? [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:04 pm
Mulgrew:This letter will confirm the mutual understandings and agreements between the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York ("DOE") and the United Federation of Teachers ("UFT"). [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice), (KEI),… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
The enforceability of non-competes in the United States is almost entirely a matter of state law, and in Connecticut, that largely means common law. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 12:23 pm
On August 2, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a significant ruling, United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
At its June 2019 plenary session, the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) adopted Recommendation 2019-1, “Agency Guidance Through Interpretive Rules. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 12:23 pm
On August 2, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a significant ruling, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:04 am
He agreed and stipulated to the factual basis for his guilty plea and agreed that if the case were to proceed to trial, the United States could prove the agreed-to facts beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
It describes itself this way:The Group of 77 (G-77) was established on 15 June 1964 by seventy-seven developing countries signatories of the “Joint Declaration of the Seventy-Seven Developing Countries” issued at the end of the first session of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in Geneva. . . [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
” The Constitution provides that the president, like the vice president and all civil officers of the United States, “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
In Hoffman v Challis [2016] NSWSC 142 made various rulings on imputations pleaded by the plaintiff. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
Furthermore, Article 5 of the 1982 Constitution imposes strict duty for state organs to adhere to constitutional principles:No law or administrative or local rules and regulations shall contravene the [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:11 pm
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, the United States House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act by a vote of 325-91. [read post]
