Search for: "v. "
Results 2961 - 2980
of 493,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2008, 8:59 am
In Warner v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:56 am
Van Colle and another v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50; [2008] WLR (D) 284 “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the state's decision to call… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
SPITZER v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:11 am
Ackerman v Ackerman and others; [2011] EWHC 3428 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 399 “The test for materiality in cases where an expert, appointed to make a determination, was alleged to have departed from his express or implied procedural instructions including an obligation of fairness was that: (a) if the decision was inevitable, it would not be material; (b) whether a determination was otherwise invalidated depended upon all the circumstances of the case, the… [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:08 am
Regina v Gul (Hamesh): [2012] EWCA Crim 1761; [2012] WLR (D) 245 “Where a defendant was sent for trial to the Crown Court on an indictable only offence but no such offence was included in the indictment when it was signed and the procedure to determine mode of trial was not followed such non-compliance with those procedural requirements would not result in the proceedings being a nullity where the defendant was able to cure any defect in the process by… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:19 am
Edgerton v Edgerton and another: [2012] EWCA Civ 181; [2012] WLR (D) 47 “Where the High Court had made a final decision which was binding on the parties and conclusively determined the ownership of assets, the parties were estopped from arguing in proceedings in another division of the High Court that the ownership of the disputed assets was different. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 11:25 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted the petition for certiorari in Ministry of Defense and Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:28 pm
In a dramatic victory for environmental justice, Shell Oil just settled the case Wiwa v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Rose v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:36 pm
The case is Hix v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Board decision: Briggs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:40 am
The post Case Comment: R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice; R (AM) v DPP [2014] UKSC 38 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:23 am
The post DAVID HOWARD COCHRAN v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm
Last month, in Attorney Grievance Commission v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 10:00 am
The Decision Haywood v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 7:02 am
The post JOSEPH MARVIN SWANN v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am
” Though she didn’t write it, Wynette lived the lyrics of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E,” having been... [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 12:29 am
Land Rover Defender Author Jacopo Prisco Licence Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 GenericSource Wikipedia Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Mrs Justice Rose) Jaguar Land Rover Ltd, v Twisted Automotive Ltd, [2018] EWHC 3536 (Ch) This was an appeal by Jaguar Land Rover Ltd. against Louise White's decision in Re LR, Twisted Automotive Lt.d. v Jaguar Land Rover [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
PITTS v. [read post]
