Search for: "ADOPTION OF A MINOR (No. 2)." Results 281 - 300 of 4,379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
There is an overall increase in the private use of these technologies worldwide, specifically to combat minor crimes and create watchlists largely unbeknownst to individuals being surveilled. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
§ 1252(a)(2)(D), or whether this determination is a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
As Chief Justice Morawetz enters his 5th year as head of the Ontario Superior Court, it is both appropriate and necessary (given the court’s acknowledged culture of complacency) to ask “how well is he overseeing court operations? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am by Jan von Hein
Article 5 of the EuUnterhVO thus not only dispenses with the protection of the structurally weaker party that is usually granted under procedural law by means of a judicial duty to inform (such as Article 26(2) EuGVVO), but is in contradiction even with the other provisions of the EuUnterhVO, which are designed to achieve the greatest possible protection for the minor dependent child. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[38] As then-Commissioner Paul Atkins once said, “[W]e must be vigilant that the shareholder proposal process does not result in the tyranny of the minority. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:41 pm by Florian Mueller
Even Meta, despite Mark Zuckerberg's preferential voting rights, ultimately felt forced to cut costs in some loss-making areas. 2. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
An employer in a jurisdiction that bans political affiliation discrimination[2] has no First Amendment right to refuse to hire Democrats, even if it describes such discrimination as a boycott. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 7:43 am by Russell Knight
“A parent, adoptive parent or adjudicated parent, whose parental rights have not been terminated, or a guardian or a standby guardian of an unmarried minor or of a child likely to be born may designate in any writing, including a will, a person qualified to act under Section 11-3 to be appointed as successor guardian of the minor’s person or estate, or both. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Then the en banc Federal Circuit reversed, holding by a 10-2 vote that “[b]y its plain language, § 3327(d)(2) applies to Rudisill” and was not exempt from the limitation because he had several periods of service. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Alex Phipps
Defendant was convicted in 2012 for five counts of indecent liberties with a minor and first-degree sexual offense, as well as habitual felon status. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
LPL Financial LLC, Lexis Employment Classification—ABC Test and Exemptions—Constitutionality—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s judgment, held that Labor Code § 2783(d)(1) exemption from application of “ABC test” (first adopted in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
After several years and proposals, the SEC adopted largely as proposed significant changes to Rules 101 and 102. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:43 pm by Kurt R. Karst
In doing so, we hope FDA will adopt an open mind when it comes to expanding the topics on which it will consider providing informal feedback. [read post]
  In what appears to have been a bipartisan effort in this most recent legislative session, the franchise tax has been slated for eventual repeal.[2]  Nevertheless, the CFT is to be phased out at the cost of certain reductions to incentive programs, discussed below. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
Under this law, which requires agencies to provide information demanded by any seven members of the House committee or five members of the Senate committee, a minority of the committee (usually members of the minority party) can seek information even when the rest of the committee is opposed or indifferent. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by John Elwood
Watson, 22-412Issue: Whether any amendment to a law originally adopted for an impermissible racially discriminatory purpose, no matter how minor the amendment and no matter the historical context, cleanses the law of its racist origins for 14th Amendment purposes unless the party challenging the law can prove that the amendment itself was motivated by racial discrimination. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am by Matrix Law
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 (“Buchanan”), the House of Lords decided by a 3:2 majority that the broad interpretation should be adopted. [read post]