Search for: "ALLEN v. US " Results 281 - 300 of 2,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2009, 11:07 pm
The Supremes will answer that question for us next term: cert. was granted in Padilla v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
Allen, 211 F.3d 970 (6th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (upholding search warrant based on allegations of CI having seen unstated quantity of cocaine in residence without any evidence that drugs would be present when warrant executed), and United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Jeff Welty
For now, Allen is a useful case for prosecutors dealing with citations with imprecise charging language. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am by Andrew Crank, Olswang LLP
Securities and Exchange Commission to appoint a receiver (the “US Receiver”) over the assets of SIB, Allen Stanford and other individuals who were allegedly running the scheme. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:52 pm by charonqc
  And let us not even think about the political point scoring on this… see Guido below *** The Jack of Kent / David Allen Green posts on this topic are here… I’ve listed them with the most recent at the top – very comprehensive and well worth a read if you wish to look at this topic in more detail MetGate: the law relating to interception of telephone calls and voicemail MetGate: why an inquiry is not a party matter #MetGate: These invoices… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:02 am by Charon QC
Useful reading: On Sedley v Sumption, here’s Sumption’s FA Mann lecture from last year: Sedley’s LRB article in response Whigs and Hunters. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 4:31 pm by Bruce Cohen
  The importance of such boilerplate terms was highlighted in the recent unpublished case, Allen and May Mettler dba Arm Construction v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:52 am by law shucks
Ropes v Kirkland Latham Raids Another Firm [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 1:15 pm by Jordan Schneider
For a Department of Defense perspective, former DOD staffer and current CSIS fellow Greg Allen talks us through AI technology in China. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:05 am by Jon Gelman
The Appellate Court held that it would not disturb the trial decision as there was insufficient evidence the the trial Judge's credibility determinations were in error.Schofel v. [read post]