Search for: "ANTHONY v. THE STATE (three cases)" Results 281 - 300 of 1,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At BuzzFeed News, Chris Geidner reports on the court’s decision this week to send Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case back to the state court “’for further review in light of Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 3:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
In 1992, the issue came up again, but the Court ruled in the case of Quill Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am by SHG
As noted in the New York Times’ editorial, Justice Anthony Kennedy seized the opportunity to write a concurring opinion in Davis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
’” Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf cites two upcoming Supreme Court cases, Husted v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Michael Lumer
This is enough to get this issue to trial.I heartily recommend the decision for all aficionados of true crime stories, Mafia tales, or civil rights litigation.Pipitone v CNY by ml07751 [read post]
A total of 27 states, as well as various industry and trade groups, have challenged the 2023 final rule in cases that were filed in three federal district courts before the Court decided Sackett. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
In that case, the Baccarat Fremont Developers asked the Supreme Court for a ruling that the Ninth Circuit was required to issue a "redetermination" in light of Justice Anthony Kennedy's concurring opinion in Rapanos v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am by Amy Howe
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen looks ahead at the death penalty case Williams v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am by Joe Consumer
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am by Joe Consumer
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:26 am by John Elwood
Three apparent new relists: Swartout v. [read post]