Search for: "Affordable Express Corp." Results 281 - 300 of 631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Because of the idea/expression dichotomy, the court noted, only expressions were being restored to their authors—the ideas themselves were still public property. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:29 am
(MSFT),International Business Machines Corp. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am by Peter Mahler
In June 2009, I wrote about a ruling by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of HMS Venture Management Corp. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:17 pm
Fed Express Corp    Western District of Tennessee at Memphis 08a0218p.062008/06/24 USA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:17 pm
Fed Express Corp    Western District of Tennessee at Memphis 08a0218p.062008/06/24 USA v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
If Hospitaller did not exist or offer appropriate services at the time of Kenneth's death, his estate would pass to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Camden, New Jersey for it to use "as nearly as possible for the intentions expressed herein, that is, for the special education and rehabilitation of the mentally and physically handicapped. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Paramount Pictures Corp, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that “television viewing” and “videocassette viewing” were not “coextensive” terms.8  And, that a license which included the right to exhibit a film on TV did not include the right to distribute the film on home video. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Paramount Pictures Corp, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that “television viewing” and “videocassette viewing” were not “coextensive” terms.8  And, that a license which included the right to exhibit a film on TV did not include the right to distribute the film on home video. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Paramount Pictures Corp, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that “television viewing” and “videocassette viewing” were not “coextensive” terms.8  And, that a license which included the right to exhibit a film on TV did not include the right to distribute the film on home video. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 7:35 am
  As I previously expressed it:   Welcome to the realm of agency risk. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
The Scope of the Protection Afforded by the Copyright Act It is a basic principle of copyright law that the Act protects only original expression in a work and not mere ideas, stock devices, or elements in the public domain. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
The lawyers argued that their concerted action was expression protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
Clearly, the extent to which it emerges in the course of cross-examination of a family consultant that he or she has expressed opinions or recommendations in the absence of affording a party a fair opportunity to be heard is likely to reduce, or even destroy the weight which would otherwise be given such conclusions or recommendations. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am by Frodnesor
" [1325(a)(5) specifies the treatment that must be afforded to secured claims under a Chapter 13 plan]. [read post]