Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
Second, the United States Supreme Court has "insisted that the discretion of the official in the field be circumscribed as held in Delaware v Prouse. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Although the Court held a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 6:24 pm
Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 3:57 pm
The NJ Supreme Court recently decided State v Privott. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:39 pm
Regis Mohawk Tribe v Mylan Pharm., Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
They are akin. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:47 am
(People v Norman, 2007 NY Slip Op 04668). [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:25 am
Connecticut, Kunz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:10 pm
The State is at no risk of that. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:24 am
To the case page for United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:26 am
On Wednesday May 6, 2020 the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Barr v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm
The court in R. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Indeed, Florida courts, as in Montgomery v State, State v Mason and Smith v State, have held that a nolo contendere plea with adjudication withheld is generally considered a conviction for purposes of determining a defendant's sentence for subsequent convictions. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
Based on a poorly developed record, the court cannot conclude that the prosecution sustained its burden of establishing probable cause akin to People v Hargroves, People v Sanchez, People v Sellers, People v Yiu C. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Highlighting the similarities, the court pointed out that the Grünbaum heirs were already cognizant of their claim, akin to the circumstances in Bakalar v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am
Science, but God v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:53 am
Previously Participated as Counsel for the State Article 30.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and Article V, Section 11, of the Texas Constitution both require the disqualification of a judge “who has previously participated as counsel for the State in a pending matter. [read post]
