Search for: "Am. Federation of State, Etc. v. State, Etc."
Results 281 - 300
of 588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2014, 11:54 pm
Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 1:10 pm
I am including our response to the filing to prevent removal of the case back to State Court. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
They both seem to want to argue that Congress is not exercising legitimate power in the Jerusalem Passport legislation, but – perhaps to avoid a ruling under the foreign Commerce Clause that would narrow federal power generally (including vis a vis the States) – they fudge the relationship between Congress’s lack of power and the President’s exclusive power. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 5:44 am
Having unsuccessfully offered the university the possibility of purchasing its own ebooks, Ulmer started proceedings for copyright infringement over unauthorised scanning of that book and other works.Following partial victory before the Landgericht of Frankfurt am Main (Frankfurt District Court), both parties appealed before the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany's Federal Court of Justice). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am
That is why I am always grateful to have the opportunity to publish a guest post from a non-U.S. reader. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
SAP Am., Inc., 717 F.3d 1255, 1268 (Fed. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
Of one thing, however, I am certain. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 6:43 am
I am reminded of this piece of trialcraft by the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 1:06 pm
(The first was just a few months ago, State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:51 am
Drop a line to ken at popehat etc. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 11:40 am
(b)(2)(v) Divided or one-way roads. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am
Insureds who conduct such countermeasures may themselves be in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act or other state and federal regulations. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:32 am
However, I am not certain that people always know what that means. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:39 am
In Flanagan v. [read post]
