Search for: "Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure" Results 281 - 300 of 822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Instead of filing a notice of appeal within the 14 days as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), Lambert filed a motion for reconsideration. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm by Mark Walsh
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, a ruling breathlessly awaited by hosts of Supreme Court podcasts all over the world. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
Circuit’s 2-1 ruling granting the IFC immunity over the concurrence (really, dissent) of Judge Cornelia Pillard. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States, and, if so, whether a conviction for burglary of a dwelling under Florida law qualifies as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
§924(c)(3)(B), yet another criminal code provision defining “crime of violence. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States, and, if so, whether a conviction for burglary of a dwelling under Florida law qualifies as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am by MBettman
Washington, 542 U.S.296 (2004) (Striking down  Washington’s criminal sentencing procedures that allowed a judge rather than a jury to make findings that increased the penalty beyond the statutory maximum.) [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
The court denied certiorari in all the relisted cases that involved robbery statutes other than Florida’s, suggesting that the justices think those states’ robbery statutes are too dissimilar for those petitioners to benefit from a ruling in favor of Denard Stokeling. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Brown, 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Brown 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by John Floyd
  Motion to Suppress Raises Jurisdictional Defect of Warrant   Werdene promptly filed a motion to suppress the warrant under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure which, at the time, did not allow the federal magistrate to issue a warrant authorizing searches outside of the jurisdiction in which the warrant was issued. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, in which the justices will decide whether the existence of probable cause defeats a retaliatory-arrest claim. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 5:45 am
It then ruled that despite the request for and authorization of a search and seizure not allowed any Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure, the evidence should be admitted anyway because the FBI agents who procured the warrant acted in good faith.Investigating dark web distribution of child pornography, the FBI seized a server for an online forum called Playpen in North Carolina, arrested its Florida owner, and moved the server to a location in the Eastern… [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” After issuing decisions, the justices heard oral arguments in two criminal-procedure cases. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices also heard oral arguments in two criminal-procedure cases. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
This morning the court hears oral argument in two criminal-procedure cases. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
Vogt, which asks whether a probable-cause hearing is part of a criminal case within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment’s self-incrimination clause. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:41 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Pursuant to amendments to HIPAA enacted as part of the HITECH Act, civil penalties typically do not apply to violations punished under the criminal penalty rules of HIPAA set forth in Social Security Act , 42 U.S.C § 1320d-6 (Section 1177). [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:43 am by MBettman
On appeal, the Third District, in a unanimous opinion, reversed the trial court’s ruling which found Ohio’s 1993 death penalty statute unconstitutional under the Sixth Amendment. [read post]