Search for: "American President Lines v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 1,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 1:06 pm by Daniel Shaviro
  Kind of like Michael Corleone moving the family business to Las Vegas.So far as the mens rea required for tax fraud is concerned, Trump may also have reasonably believed that this line of argument made the payments to Cohen a proper deduction, since surely we know that he was lying when he said publicly that it was merely a personal and private matter.A further issue pertains to Internal Revenue Code section 162(c)(2), which denies deductions for “an illegal bribe, illegal… [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
Trump celebrated his 365th day as president of the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am by SHG
Tomorrow, the first Monday in October, begins the new term of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm by Quinta Jurecic
The president-elect will soon learn the United States’ “deep secrets,” Bob Woodward writes at the Post—that is, its covert actions and intelligence sources and methods. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:15 pm by Kristen Clarke and Ezra Rosenberg
In 2006, Roberts had joined Justice Antonin Scalia’s concurrence to the decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
She entered New York elected politics, becoming the first African American woman in the state Senate, and the first woman elected Manhattan Borough president. [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:01 am by Adam Chan
This vacated a 2020 panel opinion that had rejected al-Hela’s claims on the grounds that, as a nonresident alien without presence or property in the United States, he possessed no constitutional due process rights. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The defendants allegedly conducted what they called “information warfare against the United States,” with the stated goal of “spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general…” U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:27 pm
Gore, where, along party lines, the High Court gave the 2000 election to President Bush. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]