Search for: "Andrews v. State of Georgia*" Results 281 - 300 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm by Victoria Kwan
Without independence, there is no Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:18 am by Emma Snell
Andrew Jeong reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:00 pm by BKK
It also includes discrimination based on sex stereotyping, actual or perceived sexual orientation or transgender status, and other circumstances where the plaintiff “was perceived as not conforming to traditional male stereotypes” the court stated, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in 2020 in Bostock v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46)   New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office)   South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP)   Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46)   Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for ‘Made in… [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
Every year now, there are approximately 50,000 SWAT raids in the United States, according to Professor Pete Kraska of Eastern Kentucky University's School of Justice Studies. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]