Search for: "Application of Apparel, Inc"
Results 281 - 300
of 329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
Although the national standards, which identify amounts for “food, housekeeping supplies, apparel and services, and personal care products and services,” and a fixed miscellaneous” amount, id. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:28 pm
Poof Apparel Corp., 528 F.3d 696, 701 (9th Cir. 2008), is uncertain at best. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:39 am
Deadly Doll, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court: Canwest v… [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
Civil enforcement actions against the parties responsible for triggering and fueling the opioid epidemic are a critical part of the department’s ongoing efforts to address this crisis.Consistent with this focus, the largest False Claims Act settlements in the past year resulted from significant resolutions with prescription opioid manufacturers: Indivior Inc. and Indivior plc (Indivior), and Purdue Pharma (Purdue). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
” JA Apparel involved an eponymous clothing line where the designer sold the line, then started a new one and ran ads for the new line that included his name. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:20 pm
Boast Apparel, Inc., No. 23, 2019 (Del. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Heirs of Superman’s creator Jerome Siegel win share of copyright with Time Warner: (IP Law360), (IPKat), (Public Knowledge), Delhi High Court recognizes, for the first time in India, the need to consider public interest in allowing or rejecting an order of injunction: (Indian Patent Oppositions), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),… [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:10 am
PayPal Holdings Inc. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:40 am
The omission in Section 2, AC Holdco argued, precluded advancement under Chancellor Bouchard’s reasoning in his 2015 ruling in Charney v American Apparel, Inc.. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
Goya Foods Inc., No. 2:19-cv-19003 (D.N.J. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:49 am
Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., 378 F.Supp.2d 334, 339 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:31 am
At one level, there may be nothing remarkable about the timing of these actions’ filings, given the applicable statute of limitation (refer here), which allows actions to be brought up to two years after the discovery of the alleged fraud. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:52 am
TrademarkEsq - Intellectual Property current events are highlighted in this Blog with particular attention to Trademarks, Copyrights and Licensing in the areas of Entertainment, Publishing, the Internet, as well as Apparel, Sports, Sporting Goods and Culinary trademarks. 668. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
Sims Vibration Laboratory Inc., et. al. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
The truckers sued transportation and logistics company, Werner Enterprises, Inc., alleging minimum wage violations due to the truckers’ alleged misclassification as independent contractors and not empl [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. [read post]
