Search for: "Application of Floyd" Results 281 - 300 of 607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 7:36 am by Josh H. Escovedo
He crossed over to boxing to fight the greatest boxer of all time, Floyd “Money” Mayweather. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Brian Cordery
HHJ Hacon referred to Lord Justice Floyd’s comments in Fujifilm that the existence of pending applications cannot in itself be a justification for Arrow relief, concluded that GSK had not demonstrated that there was a sufficient reason why an Arrow declaration should be granted, and accordingly granted the application for strike out of the claim for Arrow relief. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:47 am by Beth Graham
Next, JJF filed a lawsuit against the Altman Group and Diaz in Floyd County, Texas. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Following Volumes I and II and the conference which took place in March, Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his third volume of the keenly awaited Retromark trade mark litigation round up.Here’s what Darren writes:“Six months have passed already. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
As Floyd LJ determines in this judgement, “procedural rules such as this are the servants of justice and not the other way round. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
. ***********************************************************  Floyd “Money” Mayweather is one of the greatest pound-for-pound boxers in history, while DJ Khaled is a brilliant musical artist and wildly popular Internet phenomenon. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  Here is a picture of Ian O'Flaherty (founder of Lit Software), Tara Cheever (product manager) and Kyle Kvech (lead applications developer) at the booth. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 10:05 pm
Floyd LJ (for a unanimous Court of Appeal) noted that an important point of detail is the time and circumstances in which the national authority has to determine whether a product is protected by a basic patent - this falls to be judged when the product is known and authorised to be placed on the market. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am by ASAD KHAN
The justices agreed with the Government’s reasoning and held that misrepresentations in an application for UK citizenship render the applicant liable to be deprived of that citizenship pursuant to s 40 of the 1981 Act. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The world of directors’ and officers’ liability is always dynamic, but 2017 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
On this and other points where the application of expertise and judgment is expected, I believe that gatekeepers and others, including securities lawyers, accountants and consultants, need to focus on their responsibilities. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Indeed, Chairman Clayton warned in an extraordinary ICO Statement issued on December 11th, 2017: “On this and other points [of this ICO statement] where the application of expertise and judgment is expected, I believe that gatekeepers and others, including securities lawyers, accountants and consultants, need to focus on their responsibilities. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Floyd Abrams, New York City, for respondents. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 5:31 am by Brianna Smith
” Fortunately for the older applicant, Floyd Cardwell, the lawsuit reached a settlement agreement after the Georgia corporation agreed to pay $45,000. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 5:31 am by Brianna Smith
” Fortunately for the older applicant, Floyd Cardwell, the lawsuit reached a settlement agreement after the Georgia corporation agreed to pay $45,000. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 3:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark  As I noted in a recent post (here), the business pages these days are full of headlines about Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
In terms of inherent distinctive character, Lord Justice Floyd observed that the test for assessing distinctiveness for 3D trademarks, as set in Freixenet, is whether "…the appearance of the product itself [is] no different from those applicable to other categories of trade mark". [read post]