Search for: "Application of Hughes" Results 281 - 300 of 1,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It agreed with the Court of Appeal that the CAT’s decision is undermined by error of law and sent the respondent’s application for a CPO back to the CAT. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Board’s categorical exclusion of Music Choice’s transmissions from the grandfathered rate conflicted with the unambiguous statutory language, though the board had discretion to determine whether partsof Music Choice’s current service offering, which includes mobile applications and internet-exclusive channels, should be excluded from the grandfathered rate. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 12:45 pm by John Lande
From TFOI Elayne Greenberg: About the Dispute Resolution Advancement Award Given annually through the Hugh L. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:24 am by William Ford, Anna Salvatore
Nonresident senior fellow Lee Beck will moderate the conversation and the panelists will include Allyson Anderson Book of Baker Hughes, Erin Burns of Carbon180, Brett Perlman of the Center for Houston’s Future and Rich Powell of ClearPath. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The first is Mastercard Incorporated and Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In 2003, Privātā Dzīve published an article about the break-up of the applicant’s partner’s previous marriage, including pictures of the applicant and information about her pregnancy with their first child. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 23, Tuesday 24, Wednesday 25 and Thursday 26 November, the Supreme Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm by Edward Foley
Hughes, to the point that Justice Hugo Black considered it straightforward when he granted an emergency order to deprive the federal district court of jurisdiction over the vote-counting dispute in the infamous case involving Ballot Box 13 in Lyndon Johnson’s race for the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Friday 13 November, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R (on the application of Maughan) (AP) v Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 6:11 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The 2020 Sir Hugh Laddie Lecture will be delivered by Professor Daniel J. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am by Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan
This post is the second of a five-part series on litigation about mail voting during the 2020 general election. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
”[x] On Sept. 15, B3i announced “several major enhancements” to the application, with future improvements planned for 2021. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2020) (nonprecedential) In a terse opinion, Judge Hughes has affirmed the demurrer (12(b)(6) decision by Judge Sweeney (S.D. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:50 am by Jon Brodkin
There were 119 applicants that did not make the final list.Read 7 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:03 am by Dennis Crouch
Judge Dyk wrote in dissent as did Judge Hughes and Judge Wallach. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by CharlesB
Aroste used the identities of deceased individuals to create Social Security applications and used her ability to approve those applications to generate benefits where the funds would be directed to bank accounts controlled by Aroste, according to the story. [read post]