Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 281 - 300
of 410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2012, 7:45 pm
In addition to liability for back pay awards, violation of wage and hour mandates carries substantial civil – and in the case of willful violations, even criminal liability. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:51 pm
In some cases, retirees can receive more than the PBGC maximum guarantee. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:42 pm
Nosal, 676 F.3d 854, 863-64 (9th Cir. 2012), the Carrington case defendants cannot be sued in the Arizona federal court for a CFAA violation (of course, both individuals may be liable for non-CFAA causes of action). [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 12:19 am
Judge Sparks rejected these arguments, citing with approval from District of Arizona G. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 7:46 pm
Violation of these requirements can result in significant civil or even criminal liability. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:13 am
The Fourth Circuit, unable to predict how the Virginia Supreme Court would rule on this issue, certified the individual liability question to the Virginia Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:12 am
Governments can also control the behavior of companies, as Arizona has done in enacting a statute mandating enrollment in E-Verify, the Department of Homeland Security’s employment-eligibility verification database – a law the Supreme Court upheld in U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:55 pm
State of Arizona. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:29 am
So, the damages award was vacated and the case was remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:35 pm
” One example of how this language of the NLRA can play out in a litigated dispute comes from the relatively recent decision of American Red Cross Arizona Blood Services Region and Lois Hampton, 2012 WL 311334 (NLRB Div. of Judges, February 1, 2012). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:14 pm
As far as we can tell, it looks like the right decision was made, and it is interesting that this even case made it all the way up to the Arizona Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am
Federal Circuit Court Finds Part C Medicare Advantage Plans Have Same Rights as CMS When Seeking Recovery from Primary Payer On June 28, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit published its decision on Humana Medical Plan and Humana Insurance Company v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 am
” It covers other states as well, including Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii, and Alaska. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
The Arizona Supreme Court granted review to resolve the apparent conflict between McCloud and this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
And bad news for Arizona in Ryan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:20 am
The Supremes will scrutinize the supervisor liability rule established in the Faragher and Burlington Industries cases and resolve whether it applies to (1) harassment by anyone with the authority to oversee the complainant’s work or merely (2) those with the power to “hire, fire, demote, promote, transfer, or discipline” the complainant. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:21 am
Battani of the Eastern District of Michigan decided the case of Ajuba International , LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 11:08 am
431 F.Supp.2d 247, 261-62 (D.Conn. 2006) (finding that statements made on form U-5were not subject to absolute privilege from defamation liability under Connecticut law, but were instead subject to qualified privilege); Boxdorfer v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Schriro, 08-7229, is an AEDPA case out of Arizona concerning Cook’s allegedly ineffective trial counsel. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:41 am
Palestinian Authority, a case that was one of a pair of human rights cases argued on February 28. [read post]
