Search for: "B. C. Daniels, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2017, 10:58 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
La exposición de motivos del P. de la C. 453 y el P. del S. 212, establece que las regulaciones laborales de Puerto Rico “[c]rean obstáculos a la creación de oportunidades de empleo o dificultan que los patronos y empleados pacten sus propias condiciones de trabajo a beneficio de ambos”. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm by admin
LTL Management LLC was formerly known as Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 12:07 pm by admin
Fang, “The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications,” 7 mBio e00809 (2016); Daniele Fanelli, Rodrigo Costas, Ferric C. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
Professors Daniel Kleinberger and Carter Bishop, both of whom served as reporters for the NCCUSL committee that [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
Professors Daniel Kleinberger and Carter Bishop, both of whom served as reporters for the NCCUSL committee that [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by William B. Gould IV
The theme of my remarks today relate to the fact that The Old Order Faileth and it is a development very much tied to contemporary labor relations and labor laws and our search as practitioners for new answers. [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:11 am
Y podrá vender la base sin mi consentimiento (art. 11 inc. 3 b). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
The Director dismissed a charge alleging, as amended, that the Union violated §209a.2(b) of the Act, inasmuch as individual employees lack standing to allege a breach of that subsection. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
  Aside from the difficulties that Google and other internet intermediaries are having in determining what is inaccurate, out of date and irrelevant, the reported English cases since Costeja, most notably Daniel Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) and Max Mosley v Google Inc and Google Limited ([2015 ] EWHC 59 (QB)) have highlighted a very significant tension between data protection law and the law of defamation and other content laws (including Article 8… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by William McGrath
The Act also provide relief to EGCs with respect to disclosure requirements, including exemption from the "say on pay" provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the auditor attestation of internal controls required by Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]