Search for: "BARKER v. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Four years later, however, the Lords revisited the principles established by Fairchild in the case of Barker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
MRT, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:03 pm
In Peter's Excellent Motion to Dismiss he argued that Barker v Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) was controlling and that the following factors must be considered:1. length of delay - nearly four years, any time over one year between indictment and arrest is presumptively prejudicial2. reason for the delay - here government negligence to move the case forward and even gained a tactical advantage because the Defendant no longer had possible witnesses available for his defense.3. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:23 pm
They were Magistrate Jane Magnus-Stinson, selected about two years ago to replace retired Magistrate V. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:25 pm
The case, titled Ross v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:49 pm
Barker and Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
_______________________NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT IN THE COURT AT LAW LOAN TRUST A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST PLAINTIFF … [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:21 am
The Court must also apply the four-part test articulated in Barker v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Barker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:53 pm
Steffens v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:07 pm
Amy V. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Tamburo v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:09 am
The Supreme Court was required to consider the following issues: - whether, on the appropriate construction of the policies in issue, mesothelioma is ‘contracted’ or ‘sustained’ at the moment the employee inhales the dangerous fibres or at the moment of manifestation of the disease; and - whether the special rule as determined in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 and Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 applies when… [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:04 am
[57] In Barker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:38 pm
Batoff of Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel on their HR Legalist Disney’s Influence on United States Copyright Law – Sacramento lawyer Josh H. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:53 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: K579.L5 L39 2015Kit Barker, Ross Grantham & Warren Swain, eds., The Law of Misstatements: 50 Years on from Hedley Byrne v Heller (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
I previously introduced Lisa Milot (Georgia) as one of our guest tax experts for today’s mini-symposium on Perez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:48 am
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination Vance v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:48 am
Here’s the rest of what I read this week: Discrimination Vance v. [read post]
