Search for: "BARTLETT v. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Bartlett, in which the Court will consider whether federal law preempts state law design-defect claims brought against generic pharmaceutical products, here, and in Sebelius v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:27 am
Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:30 am
United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:59 pm
Greenaway, Jr., previously of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and currently serving on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am
Bartlett – must a maker of a generic drug that allegedly caused harm to a patent take the drug off the market if that is the only way it can obey both federal drug law and state drug product law Wednesday, March 20: 12-123 — Horne v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
PLAC has demonstrably been on the front lines of prescription medical product liability litigation throughout this period:· Bartlett v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am
FDA v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Bartlett, and American Express v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:55 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:55 pm
Bartlett, where the Justices held by a 6-3 vote that Alaska state troopers had probable cause to arrest a man they confronted at a public event, and so the man could not pursue a First Amendment retaliatory arrest as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
The first of these cases is Mink v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
Allison Zieve, Director, Public Citizen Litigation Group/Director, FDLI Board Bartlett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
His opinion in Bartlett v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
March 23, 2016), and Barcal v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:30 am
Our tasty tater tot of a case for today’s consumption is Lederman v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Marks, and Allison Sloto, Milbank LLP, on Friday, November 10, 2023 Tags: CARB, Climate Disclosure, SB253, SEC SEC Adopts Short Sale Disclosure Rules Posted by Brian V. [read post]
