Search for: "BRANCH v. USA" Results 281 - 300 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Rene Blocker reports on American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
-USA (18 AD3d 722 [2d Dept 2005]), the Court wrote that a “claim and counterclaim must be by and against the same party in the same capacity” (quotations omitted). [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
District Court of the District of Columbia Judge Richard Leon issued an order of injunction against the NSA’s bulk metadata collection program as authorized under Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act and extended under the USA Freedom Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
For whatever it’s worth, the only case that has closely dealt with this, Davison v. [read post]
Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court.ANOTHER NO-DUTY ABSOLUTION (FOR EMPLOYER WHO REQUIRED 12 HOUR SHIFTS - FATIGUED WORKER CAUSE WRECK AFTER GETTING OFF WORK)Nabors Drilling, USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am by Andrew Crocker and Nate Cardozo
Nor is the executive branch shy about asking Congress for more leeway when hard-pressed. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 4:33 pm by Aaron Mackey
The court ordered the government to submit information, and also took the opportunity to appoint amici to counter the otherwise one-sided arguments by the government, a procedure given to the court as part of the 2015 USA Freedom Act (and which EFF had strongly advocated for). [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
In October 2016, the ACLU filed a motion seeking access to the court’s opinions and orders from Sept. 11, 2001 through the passage of the USA Freedom Act in 2015 (in which Congress required some declassification of opinions but which did not apply to prior opinions). [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am by Beck, et al.
That means pay the court’s filing fee (one way the judicial branch supports itself), and have jurisdiction – importantly, diversity jurisdiction – determined by who the parties are. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Here’s his statement in Politics USA. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:41 pm
" [Atari Games Corp. v Nintendo of America, Inc., 897 F.2d 1572, 1576 (Fed. [read post]