Search for: "Ball v. Ball"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,592
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2022, 4:45 am
Our last blog entry, UPC: four reasons on why the PPA is not legally in force, published on 21 April 2022, seems to have touched a nerve, as attested by the unprecedented number of comments received, for which this author is very grateful. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:55 am
In Apex Oil Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:00 am
In De Havilland v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:57 am
Buchanan Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 3:14 pm
Constantakis v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:51 am
” Mueller Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:30 am
He is the guy who sat behind you in math and blew spit balls your way, and he has graduated to imposing his right-wing extremism on the entire country. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:05 pm
In one of the most famous cases in corporate law, Paramount Communications v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 2:48 pm
Hodges is safe; This claim does not hold up to even cursory scrutiny”: Lisa Needham has this post at Balls and Strikes. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:26 pm
Even if one sees the law as “a self-contained system of legal reasoning” from which we deduce “neutral,” non-political conclusions from “general principles and analogies among cases and doctrines” (including formalist claims that judges simply call “balls and strikes” like umpires in a baseball game), one should still consider certain characteristics of the party making such deductions or calling such “balls and strikes. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:26 pm
Even if one sees the law as “a self-contained system of legal reasoning” from which we deduce “neutral,” non-political conclusions from “general principles and analogies among cases and doctrines” (including formalist claims that judges simply call “balls and strikes” like umpires in a baseball game), one should still consider certain characteristics of the party making such deductions or calling such “balls and strikes. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:30 am
“The Conservative Justices Are Doing Exactly What They Promised; The leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:19 am
The ball is in Chief Justice Roberts's Court. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:55 am
In Álvarez Ramos v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:30 am
Peter Ball – legislation, then and now (III), What next after the IICSA Peter Ball Inquiry? [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 12:10 pm
Here is the abstract: Even if one sees the law as “a self-contained system of legal reasoning” from which we deduce “neutral,” non-political conclusions from “general principles and analogies among cases and doctrines” (including formalist claims that judges simply call “balls and strikes” like umpires in a baseball game), one should still consider certain characteristics of the party making such deductions or calling such… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:54 am
The regional accrediting body did something that the governor disliked, so he responded by trying to take his ball and bat and go home. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm
And in the world of fair use, factor four was the belle of the ball. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:22 pm
“Why Conservatives Are Losing Their Minds Over the Supreme Court’s McGirt v. [read post]
