Search for: "Bank of California v. Superior Court" Results 281 - 300 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The plaintiffs, employees of Home Depot, brought an action in the Superior Court of the State of California alleging violations of California’s wage and hour law. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:19 am by Law Office of James J. Falcone
Superior Court, the bank loaned $1.5 million in exchange for two notes, each secured by separate deeds of trust on the same property in Santa Clara County. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:19 am by Law Office of James J. Falcone
Superior Court, the bank loaned $1.5 million in exchange for two notes, each secured by separate deeds of trust on the same property in Santa Clara County. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:39 pm
Homeowners have turned to suing their lenders in the Superior Court with limited success. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
This afternoon in Los Angeles, the California Supreme Court heard oral argument regarding the enforceability of an arbitration provision that prohibits employee class actions in litigation concerning alleged violations of California's wage and hour laws. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Hiro Aragaki
  The lower federal courts refused to enforce this class arbitration “waiver” under the California Supreme Court’s decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court also held that the Trust Fund stated a claim under California’s UCL. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:54 pm by Shahram Miri
The California Supreme Court rejected Michelle’s community property claim because the couple was not married. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:02 am by Amy Keller, Associate
” The Concepcion opinion, authored by Justice Scalia, seemingly ignored federalism precedent by finding that California’s Discover Bank Rule, Discover Bank v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:31 pm
The decision overturns the California Supreme Court decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Superior Court, in which the California Supreme Court concluded that employees had certain unwaiveable rights to overtime, and that under certain circumstances a waiver that precluded an employee from seeking to vindicate those rights as part of a class action could lead to a de facto waiver of those rights, the appeals court noted that in Gentry the state high court relied primarily on its earlier decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]