Search for: "Barclay v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2020, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This is according to the test laid down by the Supreme Court in 2017 in Ivey v Genting Casinos. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm by Marie Louise
The People) Red meat, yellow journalism & reporting on the copyright alert system in the US (IP Osgoode) The many murky areas of Senator Klobuchar’s ‘Anti-Streaming’ Bill (Public Knowledge) Economic contribution of fair use (Michael Geist) New Register of Copyrights: ‘Unfortunately, I start with enforcement’ (ArsTechnica) The PROTECT IP Act: We’re all infringers now (Likelihood of Confusion)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court S D Florida:… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm by Marie Louise
The People) Red meat, yellow journalism & reporting on the copyright alert system in the US (IP Osgoode) The many murky areas of Senator Klobuchar’s ‘Anti-Streaming’ Bill (Public Knowledge) Economic contribution of fair use (Michael Geist) New Register of Copyrights: ‘Unfortunately, I start with enforcement’ (ArsTechnica) The PROTECT IP Act: We’re all infringers now (Likelihood of Confusion)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court S D Florida:… [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The judgment in the case of Barclay v Tuck [2018] EWHC 1125 (QB) – handed down on 14 May 2018 – has recently become available. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:56 am by Eric
Less-Heralded But Nevertheless Interesting Disputes of the Year Some under-the-radar legal disputes that I thought were more interesting than the overhyped stories: * Barclays v. theflyonthewall. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
” After RBS, the second and third largest FSA fines, which were assessed against UBS AG and Barclays Bank plc (at £160 million, and £59.5 million, respectively) in 2012, also related to the LIBOR scandal. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm by Anubha Sinha
They relied on a Delhi HC decision( New Delhi Television Limited v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in  R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
(as he then was) cautioned in IBCOS Computers Limited v Barclays Mercantile Highland Finance Limited [1994] FSR 275 that while merely taking a sufficiently general idea does not infringe, to take a detailed “idea” may do so. [read post]