Search for: "Barrett v. Thomas "
Results 281 - 300
of 1,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2022, 10:35 pm
Justice Thomas, joined by Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett supported the Court's order. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 2:10 pm
Roberts: AFP/Thomas More v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Edited by Lisa Tucker of the Thomas R. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
Gorsuch J for the Court (Roberts CJ, and Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh and Barrett JJ concurring) held that the First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing the appellant, a designer who intended to produce customized and tailored wedding websites, to create expressive designs conveying messages with which she disagrees, such as for for same-sex marriage. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a concurring opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:36 am
Supreme Court today in Fulton v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:35 am
United States, in which Justice Gorsuch wrote for the Court, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Thomas, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Barrett, while Justices Alito, Kavanaugh and Jackson dissented. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:44 am
Justice Barrett, in particular, hinted at such constraints by invoking analogies to M'Clung v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 1:57 pm
A fractured US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Wooden v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In 1965, in Griswold v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
In a more recent case, Lujan v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
JUSTICE THOMAS would deny the applications for stays. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:49 pm
PennEast (Barrett), Minerva (Breyer), Mahanoy (Kagan), AFP/Thomas More v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 7:55 pm
The next morning, Justice Clarence Thomas added his name, then Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and days later, Justice Brett M. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:10 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:00 am
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined Alito’s opinion. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Although as was true with cases like United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:14 pm
I noted earlier that Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, and Barrett concluded that a statute prohibited the issuance of an injunction in this case–thus the states suffered an injury that the courts could not redress. [read post]
