Search for: "Battle v. USA" Results 281 - 300 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Gray on… [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:07 am by Amy Howe
  And in USA Today, Richard Wolf has the story of the (now-settled) battle over the rights to superhero characters like Captain America and the Fantastic Four. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:54 pm
Papa John's International, Inc.; Papa John's Usa, Inc., Defendants-counter Claimants-appellants [Justia] Pizza Hut - Papa John - Pizza - Business - Restaurant Chains [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
Crawling into the bunker with us is the newly relisted patent infringement case Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:11 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
DirectSat USA, LLC and UniTek USA, LLC, the parties engaged in a long-fought battle involving claims of off-the-clock work in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the wage and hour laws of three states. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:38 am
 C-281/10 P PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (click here for details of the General Court's decision and here for the grounds of appeal). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
But just as WWI, which was supposed to be “the war to end all wars” went on for a long time afterwards and WWII soon followed, the Eli Lilly case was only a battleground victory and not the end of the Investor State Dispute Resolution (“ISDS”) wars.Moreover, unlike Vimy, it may not have been necessary or even desirable for Canada to risk this Eli Lilly ISDS battle. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
ABC is seeking to rely on a new public interest defence in a defamation battle with former elite soldier and Australian Values Party founder Heston Russell, who claims the broadcaster wrongly accused him of war crimes. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 1:54 am by Ben
The fallout from the BMG v Cox case in the USA continues, with a court denying ISP Grande Communications the benefit of safe harbour protection in a case brought by the Recording Industry Association Of America (RIAA). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
Abercrombie & Fitch, et al, (EDTexweblog.com) Accushnet prevails in patent re-examination: Callaway Golf and Acushnet (Patents Post Grant Blog) Star scientific wins patent reexamination battle, but is the war already lost? [read post]