Search for: "Behrend, Behrend " Results 281 - 300 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Behrend (Case No. 11-864), which raises the following issue:  Whether a district court may certify a class action without resolving whether the plaintiff class has introduced admissible evidence, including expert testimony, to show that the case is susceptible to awarding damages on a class-wide basis. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:56 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Behrend which is expected to shed light on that question (see my November 9, 2012 blog post for more on that case). [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:53 am by Barry Barnett
Behrend, No. 11-864 (U.S.), remains under advisement. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 9:30 am by Brian Cuban
  I was moving into my freshman dorm room at Behrend College in Erie, Pennsylvania. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:56 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Behrend (for more on this case, see my November 9, 2012 blog post about the oral argument, and June 26, 2012 blog post about the grant of certiorari). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Behrend (for more on this case, see my November 9, 2012 blog post about the oral argument, and June 26, 2012 blog post about the grant of certiorari). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Behrend, 11-864, as the Term’s most-relisted grant. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:22 am
Behrend et al., No. 11-864, where the parties fought over whether the lower courts took a close enough look at plaintiffs’ model for damages. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:18 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Justice Kennedy suggested that perhaps the Daubert standard should apply differently where the judge is the finder of fact (as is the case at class certification, and would be at trial in Behrend). [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:18 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  Justice Kennedy suggested that perhaps the Daubert standard should apply differently where the judge is the finder of fact (as is the case at class certification, and would be at trial in Behrend). [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 11:04 am by John Lewis
Behrend, No. 11-864 which arose from an action brought by Philadelphia cable subscribers alleging that Comcast monopolized Philadelphia’s cable market and excluded competition in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]