Search for: "Berman v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 6:20 am by James Bickford
  At ACSBlog, Rick Hasen discusses United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:21 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, Justice Sotomayor explained that a resentencing court could take into account post-sentencing rehabilitation. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 6:55 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
This post follows on the heels of my reviewing United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
The United States has made no representations or promises as to a specific sentence. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:31 am
Berman, an authority on sentencing law at Ohio State University, said the factors cited by Justice Kennedy concerning juveniles might well apply in noncapital cases. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:24 am by Brennan W. Bolt
Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the NLRB, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]