Search for: "Best v. County of Los Angeles" Results 281 - 300 of 378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 3:13 pm by David Lat
Irell & Manella: Complaint [Superior Court of California - County of Los Angeles] Juliette Youngblood: Entertainment Lawyer of the Year [Century City Bar Association] Juliette Carolina Youngblood [Avvo] [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
BELOW THE FOLD IS TEXT VERSION OF DATABASE OF DEBT COLLECTORS __________________________________________________________________________________ 1ST CREDIT OF AMERICA LLC 300 N ELIZABETH ST STE 220-B CHICAGO, IL 60607 6464 INVESTMENTS LLC 1625 S IRIS WY LAKEWOOD, CO 80232-6347 A COMPLETE FINANCIAL INC 2016 OGDEN ST DENVER, CO 80205 AAA COLLECTORS INC DBA TRIPLE CHECK INC 2950 N ACADEMY BLVD UNIT 201 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80917 Aargon Agency Inc 3160 S Valley VW STE 206 Las… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
BELOW THE FOLD IS TEXT VERSION OF DATABASE OF DEBT COLLECTORS __________________________________________________________________________________ 1ST CREDIT OF AMERICA LLC 300 N ELIZABETH ST STE 220-B CHICAGO, IL 60607 6464 INVESTMENTS LLC 1625 S IRIS WY LAKEWOOD, CO 80232-6347 A COMPLETE FINANCIAL INC 2016 OGDEN ST DENVER, CO 80205 AAA COLLECTORS INC DBA TRIPLE CHECK INC 2950 N ACADEMY BLVD UNIT 201 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80917 Aargon Agency Inc 3160 S Valley VW STE 206 Las… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Adam Chandler
” TIME and the Los Angeles Times cover the Court’s denial of certiorari on Monday in Martinez v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:07 pm
As previously discussed on our Los Angeles County Criminal Lawyer Blog, faulty breathalyzers frequently lead to reduced or dismissed DUI charges in Ventura and elsewhere in Southern California. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
    The plaintiffs originally filed their complaint in California Superior Court for Los Angeles County. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am by Mandelman
Louis BBB is reporting that several property owners in Boone County, Missouri, have recently received letters stating that their mortgages “may be eligible for national litigation aimed at fraudulent lender actions,” but the letters did not include any company’s name, nor did they include a return address. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
- Gideon Kanner's takedown of the recent California Court of Appeal decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:29 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Los Angeles attorney Elizabeth Arce of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm's California Public Agency and Employment Blog Can I Make All My Employees Managers To Avoid Overtime Pay; and Other Myths. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:27 am by Adam Chandler
The Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post’s Reliable Source blog, and the Associated Press (via CBS News) all report the story. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
 Notwithstanding that Japan is some 5000 miles away, Californians have been treated to scary animations showing a "plume" of radiation—measured less than comfortingly in "arbitrary units"—headed for Los Angeles, triggering a run on kelp tablets. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:14 am by WSLL
Kadzielski, Fulbright & Jaworski, Los Angeles, California; Janet Lewis, Janet Lewis, Jackson, Wyoming; Thomas E. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:10 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The article is by Judges Highberger and Lichtman of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:00 am by litigationtech
This article was first published in the February 2011 edition of Los Angeles Lawyer Magazine (click for PDF), a publication of Los Angeles County Bar Association? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
The numbers involved are huge: the proposed City of Los Angeles agreement includes approximately $950 million worth of projects. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
 None of the lawyers and none of the judges appeared to be doing anything differently from their usual m.o. 3) And now my main point: The plaintiffs are arguing on appeal that Judge Walker's ruling is narrow in scope, binding only on the California Governor, Attorney General, two other state officials, and the County Clerks of Alameda and Los Angeles counties. [read post]