Search for: "Best v. State of Maryland"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 252-53 (1946)) or “No State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form” (Leloup v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:42 pm
From Jocelyn P. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm
Specifically, the complaint alleges that the defendants falsely stated that, in connection with the vote on the advisory contract, Maryland law prevents the nomination of any director other than TICC’s chosen nominees. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:20 pm
And, as we stated in FCC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Thus, in Moore v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:42 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 10:39 am
Back in June, SCOTUS heard a case called Van Buren v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
In Debra H. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form of… [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
The Year in Copyright: From Google v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:34 am
In the case, Roberts v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:14 pm
Quinn, the state court precursor to the Supreme Court decision in Baird v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:30 am
This happened in Comptroller v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in its 2019 Rucho v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 8:40 pm
In the case, Jordan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
By Jon Katz, a criminal defense lawyer and DWI/ DUI/ Drunk Driving lawyer advocating in Fairfax County, Virginia, Montgomery County, Maryland, and beyond for the best possible results for his clients. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
In Lamone v. [read post]
