Search for: "Bexis"
Results 281 - 300
of 403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2009, 8:38 pm
., No. 7 WAP 2008, as improvidently granted.Bugosh was the case that the Court had taken expressly to address whether to change Pennsylvania product liability law from its current idiosyncratic form of limited, but extreme, strict liability, to the more mainstream Restatement Third reasonableness-based approach.While the dismissal order gives no reason, Bexis (who filed an amicus brief for PLAC in Bugosh) believes that the status of the defendant as an intermediate seller, rather than as an… [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:49 pm
Jan. 26, 2006).Years ago - before blogging - Bexis represented a non-manufacturing defendant in Baycol litigation. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
It's Herrmann alone at the keyboard today, because Bexis's firm is involved in defending the Bausch & Lomb MoistureLoc cases.You may well have read about the MoistureLoc cases in the popular press.After reports about a specific eye infection -- Fusarium keratitis -- Bausch & Lomb decided to voluntarily withdraw from the market its ReNu MoistureLoc contact lens solution. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
We say "allegedly" because, whilst Herrmann can blame being out of pocket if he wants, Bexis (although likewise at ALI) doesn't rely upon that excuse. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:13 pm
Bexis' amendment will sharpens this contrast further. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:25 am
One of your co-hosts - Bexis (Herrmann couldn't make it) - leads off a day-long Harris-Martin conference on "Preemption in a Post-Levine World" at the Rittenhouse Hotel in Philadelphia on June 3, 2009. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:00 am
But sometimes Bexis will recuse himself from writing about a particular case that he's working on, and Herrmann alone will publish a post about the case, or vice versa. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:38 pm
Bexis put together this amendment. (3) fixing some lingering problems in the choice of law section ( §2.05) including the longstanding issue of whether there's a principal-place-of-business rule that would allow plaintiffs all over the country to sue under the law of a single state. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Bexis also wanted (as always) the defendant to win. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 11:20 pm
Full disclosure: Bexis is a member of the team that represents the defense in Seroquel. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
And they did that in a case in which Bexis's firm represents the defense.Now, look: Don't mess with Bexis! [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:29 am
Levine came down, we linked to the client alert on the case that Bexis' firm prepared. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
This post discusses a Vioxx case, and Bexis' tongue is thus tied. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 7:11 am
We can't say much, because Herrmann's on the road and Bexis is involved in the litigation, but a trial court in New Jersey just denied certification of an individual consumer economic loss class action, both nationwide and limited to New Jersey. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:06 am
The last section of the opinion discussed some of the practical implications that we raised about how requiring recusal in that situation could cause significant problems in the judiciary.Also, we (well, Herrmann, because Bexis is part of the Seroquel defense team) blogged earlier about the magistrate's evidentiary rulings in the Seroquel MDL, one of which was to exclude foreign regulatory actions. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:02 am
Since Bexis is at Dechert, we got that firm's release first - and we like it. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:11 am
Levine: The New York Times (quoting (among others) Herrmann); AmLaw (quoting (among others) Bexis); the Washington Post (quoting (among others) Herrmann); the Wall Street Journal (subscription only) here, here, and here (not quoting us at all); the Philadelphia Inquirer (ditto); USA Today (ditto); LA Times (ditto).There'll be more, but that's enough to keep us busy for now. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:27 am
Our first ever overseas guest post comes all the way from Thailand, where Douglas Mancill of the Deacons law firm reports on new Thai laws on product liability and their possible impact on/creation of product liability claims involving drugs and medical devices.Needless to say neither Bexis nor Herrmann had anything to do with the substance of this post, as neither of them knows much about Thailand beyond liking the food.Take it away Doug.Damage awards in Thailand for defective goods claims… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
The fascinating, and ultimately frustrating, pair of decisions in Guinan v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
This post discusses a piece of the Baycol litigation, in which Bexis's firm is involved. [read post]
