Search for: "Board of Education v. A, C & S, INC" Results 281 - 300 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am by Howard Knopf
 Educators are in a "symbiotic" relationship with students and the Copyright Act serves the goal of education, which includes access to essential material. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Howard Knopf
The relevant factors to be considered include:a. the quality and quantity of the material taken;b. the extent to which the respondent’s use adversely affects the applicant’s activities and diminishes the value of the applicant’s copyright;c. whether the material taken is the proper subject-matter of a copyright;d. whether the respondent intentionally appropriated the applicant’s work to save time and effort; ande. whether the… [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
A union’s duty of fair representation County of Tompkins and Tompkins County Sheriff and Tompkins County Deputy Sheriff’s Association, Inc., 44 PERB ¶3024, U-28437, U-28483 The Board affirmed the dismissal of a charge by the Tompkins County Deputy Sheriff’s Association, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
Read more Consumer survey: solicitors offering value for money The Legal Services Board Consumer Panel has this week published consumer satisfaction research, which suggests that an increasing proportion of consumers consider they are getting good value for money from legal services, and that 84 per cent are content with the outcome of their legal work. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
And it’s just two years after Leon joins Dartmouth’s Board… and Leon’s company, Apollo starts dressing in Six Sigma garb,  that WMC is acquired by GE for $650 million. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Michael Sirkin
In the latter situation, there is no sale or change in control when [c]ontrol of both [companies] remain[s] in a large, fluid, changeable and changing market. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Conor McEvily
  The Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]