Search for: "Board of Trade v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 11:56 am
The panel concluded that Board members are inferior officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause; and thus properly appointed by the SEC. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:53 am
Bergsman).Genericness of CHINOOK for Beer: The United States Department of Agriculture (ars.usda.gov) identifies Chinook as a hop varietal. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
As to actual confusion, since Shanghai has not exported any massage apparatus to the United States, "there has been no opportunity for actual, or potential, confusion to occur. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
The Board held that the opposer failed to establish any legitimate interest in the other corporations' trademark uses of the term at issue.The Jewelers Vigilance decisions involved a nonprofit jewelry trade association that represented 2500 firms in the United States, including suppliers, wholesalers, distributors, and retailer of diamonds and diamond jewelry. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:28 am
Rodriguez, 99 U.S.P.Q.2d 1873 (TTAB 2011) [precedential].The Board explained that "the Cuban Assets Control Regulations ('C.A.C.R.'), 31 C.F.R. part 515 et seq., which implement the United States trade embargo against Cuba, generally prohibit transactions in the United States involving property, including trademarks, in which Cuba or a Cuban National has an interest, unless licensed or exempt. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am
This has significant effects upon the United States. . . . [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
For those who served at Navy Appellate Defense during the 1990's (or I suppose Appellate Government, or Code 40, or Code 20, or NMCCA, oops and CAAF), the case United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
"The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed the district court's ruling.The Circuit Court decision is posted on the Internet at:[caselaw.lp.findlaw.com] . [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Voting in the United States is not a "use it or lose it" right. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:34 pm
In Roth v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:22 pm
United States, 435 U.S. 679 (1978) (ethics restriction on competitive bidding); Goldfarb v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:04 pm
Therefore, we advise the Board of Governors that it should accord marital status to its employees who were lawfully married in Massachusetts under the ruling of that state's highest court in Goodridge v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:28 am
by Dennis Crouch On Patently-O, our primary focus is patent law, but sometimes we remember that the “Patent Office” is actually the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
The Board found that the phrase is a common expression of patriotism, affection, or affiliation with the United States of America that will not be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
The contested patents involve a compound patent owned by Gilead and a second medical use patent owned by the government of the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:58 am
United States Postal Service v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
& 3 Ors v Chocosuisse Union Des Fabricants Suisses Never too late 89 [week ending on Sunday 27 March] – Cricket and copyright in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Anor v Tixdaq Ltd & Anor | Are business models simply jargon? [read post]
