Search for: "Borders v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 6,314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am
This subsection’s language permits return to “contiguous” countries that share a border with the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
Nov. 16, 2018Talbott v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:06 am
The Supreme Court recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Here is the abstract: Rose v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:17 am
The Court dismissed the appeal of the Secretary of State. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
A big state that borders that Pacific awaits your words. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:20 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:35 am
The case is Mesa v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:13 am
The most notable cases from national courts are Subafilms, Ltd. v MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (United States) and Abkco Music & Records Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
The post Michigan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:28 am
Can an entity or an individual enforce their rights even beyond their own borders, and if so, who has the jurisdiction over this infringement? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:04 am
In Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:26 am
Border Patrol Agent. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 2:09 pm
(Other than child pornography, in which case, go for it.)Judge Bennett says:"Border officials in our circuit are now constitutionally barred from forensically searching a traveler’s cell phone at the border, even if armed with reasonable suspicion the phone contains evidence of terrorist acts the traveler is about to commit in the United States; evidence the traveler is entering the United States under a false name; evidence of contemporaneous… [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:34 pm
But in June, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:01 pm
Ziglar v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:09 am
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:27 am
See Northern Border Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 11:03 am
In Schenck v. [read post]
