Search for: "Bridges v. California"
Results 281 - 300
of 477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:14 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, when the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm
On April 28, 2014, the California Supreme Court granted the applications and filed briefs of numerous amici curiae (“friends of the court”) in the “CEQA-in-reverse” case, California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
Conrad v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
According to Brandenburg v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:32 pm
Andrew Bridges is the fine California attorney who wrote one of the great amicus curiae briefs in Elektra v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm
Settlement of Viacom v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:04 am
A California appellate court addressed somewhat similar questions with regard to an injury during a big-budget Hollywood film shoot in Barry v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:15 am
If protracted trust litigation piques your interest, the unpublished opinion can be found on Google Scholar and the California Court of Appeal's website, Case # A137168, Hansen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm
That view is strengthened by the steady progress of the law since 2012 in cases like Cox v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Bottled water is considered a food, and we have a nice little preemption case in The Chicago Faucet Shoppe, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
And he outlined the facts from which the suit arose, noting that [Van Praagh], a resident of California, and [Gratton], a resident of New York, are siblings. . . . [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
California 13-494Issue: (1) Whether, as some courts have held, reviewing courts are required to accord “great deference” to unexplained Batson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Bridges, 13-657, out of the Louisiana Court of Appeals. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
SAP America, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Or take Frisby v. [read post]
