Search for: "Brown v. Douglas" Results 281 - 300 of 380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm by Michael Geist
While Douglas Arthur Brown of the Writers Union claimed the test is too ambiguous in his recent committee appearance, Access Copyright took a different view in a brief filed earlier this year with the Supreme Court, arguing that the flexibility in the test is a good thing: Access Copyright submits that there is no benefit in having this Court determine for all future cases that, where multiple purposes exist, one person's purpose should prevail over another's, or that… [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
Feldman argues that Black, the liberal originalist; Douglas, the activist libertarian; Frankfurter, the advocate of strenuous judicial deference; and Jackson, the pragmatist; achieved greatness by developing four unique constitutional approaches, which reflected their own personalities and worldviews, although they were able to converge on common ground in Brown v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The fact that a photograph containing “private” information has been published may be no defence to a privacy claim: Douglas v Hello! [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:28 am by Mike
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong weighed the evidentiary submissions. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm by palfrey
  There is great insight in this book as to fights over the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment; Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am by INFORRM
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457),  McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73),  Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) – and that Mr Justice Eady was not party to a single one of these decisions (although appeals against his rulings were dismissed in McKennitt and Lord Browne). [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:19 am by cdw
Douglas Anderson Lovell leads off this edition. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
: Invention Pathways Pty Ltd (ipwars.com) (Australian Patent Law) (Patentology) (Patent Baristas) (IP Spotlight) Federal Court reprimands time-wasting litigants: Hunter Douglas Inc v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
That might be so at the interlocutory stage in an attempt to avoid the rule in Bonnard v Perryman: a matter, it will be recalled that exercised this court in Woodward v Hutchins. [read post]