Search for: "Buckley v State" Results 281 - 300 of 493
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 8:00 am by Ben Cheng
McKeeDocket: 11-1426Issue(s): (1) Whether the onerous burdens imposed on political committees advocating for or against candidates may be imposed on non-profit organizations speaking about ballot measures; (2) whether the state may regulate as political committees only those organizations that meet the threshold “major purpose” test established by the Court in Buckley v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Nan Aron
FEC and previous cases like the 1976 decision in Buckley v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:58 pm
Scottish adoption law compatible with human right to family lifeA discussion of the Supreme Court judgment in ANS v ML [2012] UKSC 30. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Reynolds, 369 F.3d 1270, 1276-77 (11th  Cir. 2004)(same); Buckley v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm by Bart Torvik
But that would be wrong: state election laws have been struck down in light of Citizens United. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Leah Nicholls
In his column about the proposed amendment, Tribe writes that the rise of super PACs has less to do with the decision in Citizens United than the 1976 decision in Buckley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:19 am
Individuals have been free to make unlimited independent expenditures in support of candidates since the Supreme Court case of Buckley v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm by Rick Hasen
Guests: Brian Schweitzer: State of Montana, @brianschweitzer Rick Hasen: University of California, Irvine, @rickhasen Dave Levinthal: Politico, @davelevinthal Eugene Volokh: University of California, Los Angeles, @VolokhC Links: Schweitzer on ‘mining for influence in Montana’ (NY Times) Buckley v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:07 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In the courts Scoppola v Italy (No. 3) – 126/05 [2012] ECHR 868 (22 May 2012). [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
Peart v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 568 Court ignored key factors in “foreign criminal” deportation case. [read post]