Search for: "Butts v State" Results 281 - 300 of 654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
Claim 1 was to an elongated, tapered NAIL which had a butt portion comprising at least three tranverse holes. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:16 pm by michael
My last post pointed to a Columbus Bar Association press release about Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:20 pm by Kevin
Ken White reports today on the opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
In the store’s published FAQ, Dumb Starbucks state they are not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation: “We are simply using their name and logo for marketing purposes”. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 17 October 2017, Brown v Bower & anr  there will be a half day, trial of preliminary issue as to meaning and defamatory tendency (see [2017] EMLR 24) On the same day there will be a trial of a preliminary issue in Butt v Home Office as to whether the words complained of are fact or comment. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The Herald has also used the case to analyse the state of Australia as a jurisdiction for defamation litigation. [read post]