Search for: "C Booker"
Results 281 - 300
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2007, 10:55 am
Booker, 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) was of little significance in federal criminal sentencing. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:23 am
Although §3553(c) requires district courts to state their reasons for imposing a particular sentence, the majority said that the statute does not require district courts to write "extensively. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
C. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 11:45 am
"[C]ourts may not sentence on the basis of facts that apply to whole classes of crimes. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:03 pm
§ 3B1.1(c); and 4)Booker error Breach of a Plea Agreement by the government. [read post]
18 May 2007, 12:25 pm
§ 3A1.2(c) on ex post fact grounds. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:17 am
" The Second Circuit rejected this argument and joined the Tenth and Eleventh Circuits in "holding that, because Booker was not a guideline amendment promulgated by the Sentencing Commission, the terms of Section 3582(c)(2) do not apply, and therefore the Booker decision cannot be the basis for a Section 3582(c)(2) motion to modify a sentence. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
C. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
C. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 11:24 am
This proposed guideline amendment would substantially expand the grounds for reduction of sentence under 18 USC § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
Section 3583(b)(2) of Title 18 authorizes a three-year term of supervised release for a Class C felony (Section 922(g)(1), felon in possession, is a Class C). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
Here is how it begins:Antonio C. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Booker. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:05 pm
Booker, 41 U. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:09 pm
Anyway, as most of you know, there still is some post-Booker controversy under Fed. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:32 pm
Section 3553(c)(1) requires that the trial judge identify its reason for selecting a sentence at a particular point within a range... [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 3:56 am
"[C]riminologists and law enforcement officials testifying before the [Sentencing] Commission have noted that retail-level drug traffickers are readily replaced by new drug sellers so long as the demand for a drug remains high. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:36 am
A Booker claim is denied. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
.* Plaintiff's § 1983 claims were, in effect, appeals from state court decisions on the same issues, and they were barred by the Booker-Feldman doctrine. [read post]
