Search for: "C Roberts"
Results 281 - 300
of 9,825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 6:32 pm
’” Jess Bravin and C. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Eyer, Anti-Transgender Constitutional Law, (Vanderbilt Law Review, Forthcoming).Kevin C. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Robert Wood said the US does not support any further action by the council at present, “however, we remain focused on the difficult and sensitive diplomacy geared to getting more hostages released, more aid flowing into Gaza, and better protection of civilians. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 8:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
Robert, Gregory J. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
The court said that in deciding between venues, the SEC exercised unguided legislative power, rejecting the SEC’s much more sensible view that such judgments are executive in nature—akin to any other exercise of prosecutorial discretion, including whether to bring an enforcement action at all.It is possible, even likely, that the Roberts Court will revive and strengthen the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Seth C. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU Charter: we noted the case here. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 3:08 pm
C. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Notre Dame Law Review] On Monday, I started serial-blogging my article, The Myth of the Federal Private Nondelegation Doctrine, which has just come out in the Notre Dame Law Review. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Apart from the “naughty” aspects of the design (according to Pevsner), an unusual feature of the church is that is was the only public building in the village that unaffected by the floods of 2005 and 2015, and the Petitioners wish to be able to respond to any future flood event with appropriate facilities [22(c)]. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
In his opinion for the court, Chief Justice John Roberts cautioned that universities should not try to circumvent the court’s decision “through application essays or other means,” emphasizing that “‘what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:23 pm
FINRA Rule 8210(c) requires registered representatives to provide “information or testimony . . . pursuant to this Rule. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
Karen C. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
In Brunetti, however, Justices Roberts, Breyer, and Sotomayor noted in opinions that concurred in part and dissented in part that Erik Brunetti could still display his proposed “FUCT” mark on clothing without a registration. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
1:15-2:30 PM John C. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In this episode of our Environmental Law series, host Craig Williams is joined by Professor Robin Craig, the Robert C. [read post]
