Search for: "C. R.C. C."
Results 281 - 300
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Last week we put up a post commenting on something that we thought was wrong with New Jersey law. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
All appellants were previously classified under Ohio's Megan's Law, codified in former R.C. 2950 et seq. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
SMITH Defendant-appellant Allen Smith appeals from his conviction after the trial court found him guilty of failure to verify his current residence, in violation of R.C. 2950.06(F). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
(c)(1).) [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
{¶ 2} On September 12, 2008, appellant was charged in a six-count indictment with two counts of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), three counts of gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(1), and one count of kidnapping in violation of R.C. 2905.01(A)(4) with a sexual motivation specification. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
§ 924(c)(1)(B)(ii) that must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt as it is an element of the offense and not merely a sentencing factor. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
History: L. 1978, c. 95; amended 1980, c. 112, § 2; 1981, c. 290, § 18; 1995, c. 20, § 3; 2009, c. 283, § 2, eff. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:36 am
– confirm the constitutionality of R.C. 2745.01. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court stated:“To deny an underpaid employee the additional 25 percent penalty is contrary to the language of R.C. 4115.10(A). ... [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that in an employee-initiated action under the state’s “prevailing wage” statute, when a court finds that a contractor has failed to pay workers the prevailing wage for work on a public improvement project, the court must assess against the employer not only a judgment for the amount of the plaintiffs’ underpaid wages, but also the financial penalties set forth in R.C. 4115.10(A), unless the violation falls under one of two… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:58 am
(Michael C. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:04 am
At issue is the statutory provision set forth in R.C. 5709.87 "Exempting increase in assessed value of realty cleaned of contamination. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:18 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that when a party in a civil lawsuit moves for a stay of trial pending arbitration of the dispute, and the trial court issues an order granting or denying the requested stay, R.C. 2711.02(C) permits an immediate appeal of the trial court’s order, even when that order does not include a judicial determination that there is “no just cause for delay” in pursuing an appeal as required by Civil Rule 54(B). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:23 am
Jolls, C., C.R. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
It is found in R.C. 3109.04. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:27 pm
More specifically, the Court concluded that R.C. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:58 am
[*P27] "[C]oncepts of state property law are relevant, but not necessarily dispositive, for deciding the question whether there was a legitimate privacy interest for [F]ourth [A]mendment purposes. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
§ 2901.05(C)(2), (3). [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 2007 CA 00149, 2008-Ohio-4523 (no-law argument) In re Timothy C., 5th Dist. [read post]
