Search for: "C.J." Results 281 - 300 of 1,500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
The Court of Appeal found this argument to be unpersuasive (para. 18 of Trinchi), drawing on part of the Jarvis decision, in which Wagner C.J. wrote at paragraph 38: …a person who chooses to disrobe and engage in sexual activity with another person…necessarily expects to be observed by that other person while she is nude and engaging in that activity. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
The Court of Appeal found this argument to be unpersuasive (para. 18 of Trinchi), drawing on part of the Jarvis decision, in which Wagner C.J. wrote at paragraph 38: …a person who chooses to disrobe and engage in sexual activity with another person…necessarily expects to be observed by that other person while she is nude and engaging in that activity. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Mason, 322 A.2d 357, 359 (1974) (Jones, C.J., concurring and dissenting) (noting that the Pennsylvania criminal libel law was repealed by 1972 Pa. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 10:52 am by Diana Skaggs
Dual adoption/termination of parental rights actions governed by KRS Chapter 199 - published opinion from Ky Court of Appeals Diana Skaggs Mon, 04/08/2019 - 13:52 Read more about Dual adoption/termination of parental rights actions governed by KRS Chapter 199 - published opinion from Ky Court of Appeals C.J. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:30 pm by David Lat
[Bench Memos / National Review] * While you wait for the 2019 edition of Above the Law's law school rankings, check out the latest installment of the "revealed preferences" law school rankings, by C.J. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Yes, said an Ohio Court of Appeals majority opinion, reasoning that the speaker's past speech "was not engaged in for a legitimate reason, but instead for an illegitimate reason born out of a vendetta seeking to cause mental distress to his mother and sister and to exact personal revenge. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:02 am by Administrator
C.J., 2018 MBCA 65; 2019 SCC 8 (38220)  The Chief Justice: “For the reasons of Justice Pfuetzner, we would allow the appeal. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:21 pm by Patricia Hughes
(SCC, paras. 29 and 30) Rowe J. rejected Wagner C.J. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
As Wagner C.J. stated at para. 160, “bankruptcy is not a licence to ignore rules”. [read post]