Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. COLORADO"
Results 281 - 300
of 502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2016, 11:31 am
The fresh water pumped from the aquifer would be conveyed through 43 miles of underground pipeline to the Colorado River Aqueduct, which would then transport it to supply a number of Southern California Water agencies and users. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 6:17 am
In that case, the plaintiff brought suit in Arizona against Ives Design, a Colorado company, for trademark infringement arising out of its use of the plaintiff's `NAMEDROP’ mark by operating `namedrop.com. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:34 pm
In analyzing whether the non-assignment clause was enforceable under Colorado or California law, the court noted that under Colorado law the non-assignment clause was enforceable whether the assignment took place before or after the incurrence of a loss. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:45 am
Chang’s builds upon its July 2015 ruling in Remijas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Whether a change to California law reducing good time credits for a prisoner is a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
District Court for the District of Colorado issued recently: Wolf v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
’ In Germany data protection authorities have already started issuing proceedings against companies that are still transferring personal data to the US under Safe Harbour. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am
· Bridge Premium Finance – SEC announced fraud charges and an emergency asset freeze against a Denver-based company and Colorado residents Michael Turnock and William Sullivan II for carrying out a $15.7 million Ponzi scheme harming more than 120 investors nationwide. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:57 pm
The New Mexico case is Garcia v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Joe Company, Wm. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The American Coal Company v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
California, 403 U.S. 15, 24 (1971). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:30 pm
The companies that have done that are primarily upstart shale companies who bought drilling rights either in North Dakota or Colorado or Arkansas. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 3:13 pm
" (One of the federal district courts cited as upholding this exception is the local Central District of California based out of Los Angeles, in the case Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:44 am
As of the end of June 2015, approximately 9.9 million consumers had enrolled: 7.2 million through the federal Marketplaces and the so-called Healthcare.gov states and 2.7 million through the state based Marketplaces (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia). [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:26 am
Corona v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
However, the federal district court in California dismissed their breach of implied contract, California Customer Records Act, and Colorado and Virginia data breach notification laws claims (Corona v. [read post]
