Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2022, 8:53 pm
Its motion relied on a decision issued by the highest court in Massachusetts involving the real estate industry, where the court had held that the state’s independent contractor law was completely preempted by a state law requiring real estate companies to supervise real estate agents. 7-Eleven conceded that it exercised some level of control over its franchisees, but argued it did so consistent with the FTC Franchise Rule. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
See Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 12:27 pm
The court stated that claims based on the misappropriation of information that does not qualify as a trade secret are preempted by CUTSA. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:14 am
The California Supreme Court granted defendants’ petition for review. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:28 am
Both CH2O and Meras are industrial water purification companies, with their principle places of business in Washington and California, respectively. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
State of California (2023) 89 Cal. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
In California, and most state and federal courts, a claim can be dismissed if there is not a material issue of triable fact. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm
The plaintiff sued UPI and its parent companies who removed the case to federal court on diversity of citizenship. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Mavrix involved celebrity photos, and the defendant there ran a website that focused on the “California-centered celebrity and entertainment industries. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:13 am
Sargon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
JUST CLICK ON THE CASE NAMES BELOW… Appellate Court Case Not Originating with Appeals Board Morgenthaler v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:44 pm
The court rejected this argument, citing Budrow v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:03 am
Wang v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
In State Building & Construction Trades Council of California v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:41 pm
When the Supreme Court of the United States issued its landmark decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
First, it says a federal court can apply a state anti-SLAPP law, although state anti-SLAPP laws don’t apply to federal claims (in this case, the RICO claim). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 10:07 am
” California is not only the largest state, it is the home of many of the nation’s largest creative industries. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm
The ABC Test of Employee Misclassification The 2019 law was designed to codify a 2018 California Supreme Court ruling, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
