Search for: "CF-3"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
If the ED had had any doubt whatsoever in this respect, it would have had to contact the applicant to clarify whether OPs pursuant to A 116(1) had indeed been requested or not, because this is an inalienable right of parties to proceedings before the EPO (see T 668/89 [3]; T 95/04 [3]). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:43 pm
But the tide may turn again, because for entering into force the UPC Agreement has to be ratified or acceded by thirteen member states including the three (mandatory) Member States in which the highest number of European patents had effect in 2012 (cf. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
Furthermore, and contrary to the People’s contention, inasmuch as the only motion made by the defendant that could be deemed a motion to suppress Jose’s identification testimony was based on an incident in the courtroom during trial that was wholly unrelated to any pretrial identification, this case does not fall under the exception to the preclusion rule set forth in CPL § 710.30(3) (cf. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Obviously, the representatives were aware of this deficiency in the contested decision (see e.g. statement of grounds of appeal from opponent 2; page 3, point 3).[1.4] It is well-established case law that a party may, during appeal proceedings, file any kind of request aiming at the maintenance of the result obtained at the first-instance stage (cf. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Contrary to the [Respondents'] contention, the proceeding was not rendered academic by its post-commencement disclosure of records in response to some of the [Plaintiff] requests, since an actual controversy between the parties still exists concerning whether the [Plaintiff's] remaining requests are exempt from disclosure (see Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505; cf. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm
Latham & Watkins (2017) 3 Cal.5th 767, 775 (Parrish).) [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Cf. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
Developing transgender-friendly guidelines and rules will both foster a positive and productive work environment, as well as shield an employer from liability for discrimination, intentional or unintentional. [1] Trans Equality Society of Alberta Fact Page, “Human Rights Across Canada,” last updated: July 2015, available online: http://www.tesaonline.org/human-rights-across-canada.html (“TESA Fact Sheet”). [2] RSA 2000, c A-14. [3] CBC News, “Transgender… [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:44 pm
Cf. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:26 am
Co. of NY, Id.; cf. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:08 am
Cf. later SKEEVE v., SKEEVE n.]And the first citation brings it close to home:1976 J. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Contrary to the [Respondents'] contention, the proceeding was not rendered academic by its post-commencement disclosure of records in response to some of the [Plaintiff] requests, since an actual controversy between the parties still exists concerning whether the [Plaintiff's] remaining requests are exempt from disclosure (see Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505; cf. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:09 pm
3. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:14 pm
Section 3 then considers the transformation of origin stories. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:46 pm
The subject-matter of claim 1 and dependent claim 2 was the same as the subject-matter of independent claim 23 and dependent claim 24 of the parent application as originally filed.b) In the European Search Opinion based on the application as originally filed it was held that- neither the subject-matter of independent claim 3 and dependent claims 6 to 8, nor the description of the application were in conformity with Article 76(1) EPC, and- the subject-matter of independent claim 1 and… [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:39 am
"); cf. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am
Admissibility of the request for re-establishment of rights2.1 According to Rule 136(1) EPC a request for re-establishment of rights under Article 122(1) EPC shall be filed within two months of the removal of the cause of non-compliance with the period, which is normally the date on which the person responsible for the application becomes aware of the fact that a time limit has not been observed (cf. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
In accordance with the established case law of the Boards of Appeal (cf. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:10 am
Furthermore, the request for re-establishment of rights states the grounds and facts on which it is based (Rule 136(2) EPC).Hence, the request for re-establishment of rights is admissible.3. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
One Salmonella outbreak affected four people aged 3 to 51 and was suspected to have been caused by BBQ pork and egg fried rice. [read post]
