Search for: "CLARK V US"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
Clark v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
Clark v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:24 pm
Today the Court rejected that argument, and affirmed the decision of the Seventh Circuit, in a unanimous and straightforward eleven-page opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor in Clark v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:28 am
Clark v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
Clarke, (9th Cir., April 6, 2010), the 9th Circuit held that requiring an inmate to use his committed name along with his religious name on correspondence, intead of his religious name alone, and requiring staff to refer to him only by his committed name, does not violate RLUIPA or the free exercise clause.In Holley v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am
Last week a five-judge bench consisting of Lords Walker, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Collins heard an appeal in what is likely to become a landmark case in private international law and, specifically, cross-border insolvency. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
Read the whole opinion, Clark v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 1:21 am
Clark International Limited v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 10:35 am
Clark is the Chair of the Copyright, Entertainment, and Media Law Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:08 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, October 10, 2014:Canadian jailed in Cuba will appeal: lawyers Police report: Palins Started Second Fight After Cops Arrived Man allegedly posing as paralegal charged by Durham policeSCC rules threats of violence can be used in deciding dangerous offender status | CTV News ‘Sweeping’ secrecy surrounding complaints against judges challenged by StarUS Supreme Court blocks Wisconsin voter ID law - Times… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:00 pm
In Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 4:01 pm
Wright v Ver, sets out a useful, if non-exhaustive, list of the factors the court will consider when approaching s 9 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That seems to us to be nonsensical. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That seems to us to be nonsensical. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm
"Blurred Lines"v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
Mathis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
