Search for: "CO Hernandez" Results 281 - 300 of 573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 8:45 pm
Category: Inventorship     By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor  TitleGen. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Kathy Kapusta
In support of its position, the company relied on Raytheon Co. v Hernandez, in which the Supreme Court addressed whether the ADA conferred preferential rehire rights on disabled employees lawfully terminated for violating workplace conduct rules. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Raytheon Co. v Hernandez and EEOC guidance, Walgreens first argued that it was unreasonable to require an employer to accommodate employee theft. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The lone case citing Hernandez, supra., and following the reasoning set forth therein,, wherein the court found a misdemeanor complaint alleging possession or sale of cocaine or heroin, absent a laboratory result, "provide[s] a reasonable basis' for inferring the presence of a contraband, and thus satisfied the more stringent requirements of a facially sufficient information, at least for purposes of a CPL § 170.70 application." [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:42 pm
Category: Civil Procedure     By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor  TitleStoneEagle Services, LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:49 am by D. Daxton White
Hanauer & Co from 12/2008 – 09/2009, Wachovia Securities from 10/2007 – 12/2008, and Metlife Securities Inc from 06/2007 -10/2007. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 2:13 pm by Michael Kraut
However, the CO government wants to prevent stoned drivers from causing accidents on Rocky Mountain highways. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:18 am by Jeralyn
On Feb. 26, Alfredo Vasquez-Hernandez announced in court he would plead guilty without a plea agreement in the Chicago case in which Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman and Jesus Vicente Zambada-Garcia are co-defendants. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Co.), 221 Cal.App.4th 1353 (2013), petition for review pending, No. [read post]