Search for: "CRIM" Results 281 - 300 of 4,167
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2009, 12:44 am
Smtih Good thing I don't do any criminal work, let alone belong to any crim listserves. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:37 am by sally
Regina v Kapoor and others [2012] EWCA Crim 435; [2012] WLR (D) 72 “For the purposes of section 25(1)(2) of the Immigration Act 1971, as substituted, an ‘immigration law’ was a law which determined whether a person was lawfully or unlawfully either entering the United Kingdom, or in transit or being in the United Kingdom and did not include section 2 of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004 which made it an offence for a person not to have with… [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:28 am by sally
Regina v Kluxen; Regina v Rostas and another [2010] EWCA Crim 1081; [2010] WLR (D) 128 “Where the Secretary of State for the Home Department was required by s 32 of the United Kingdom Borders Act 2007 to make a deportation order in respect of a foreign criminal, namely a person who was not a British citizen and who had been convicted of an offence and sentenced to imprisonment or detention of at least 12 months, it was not appropriate or necessary for the sentencing court to recommend… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:54 am by sally
Regina v Bagnall; Regina v Sharma [2012] EWCA Crim 677; [2012] WLR (D) 118 “Where, in confiscation proceedings, the Crown accused an offender of an additional specific offence for which he had not been prosecuted and adduced evidence to make that accusation good, that did not amount to the bringing of a new charge. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:43 am by traceydennis
Regina v Magro and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1575; [2010] WLR (D) 176 “Although a five-judge constitution of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) had a discretion to decide that a previous decision of that court should not be treated as a binding decision when it was wrong, it was not entitled to disregard or deprive the only decision of a three-judge constitution of the court of its authority on a distinct and clearly identified point of law, reached after full argument and close… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:56 am by sally
Regina v Williams (Jason John) [2010] EWCA Crim 2552; [2010] WLR (D) 274 “As a matter of statutory construction, fault or other blameworthy conduct on the part of the defendant was not required to establish that he was guilty of an offence under s 3ZB of the Road Traffic Act 1988 of causing the death of another person by driving while unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured; and it was sufficient that the driving was a cause of the death, provided that it was a more than negligible or… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:18 am by sally
R v Modjiri [2010] EWCA Crim 829; [2010] WLR (D) 99 “The concern of s 79(3) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 is limited to the valuation of property and does not extend to the realisation of property, so that it does not have to be assumed that a beneficial interest in property has to be sold separately from the property and, for the purposes of making a confiscation order, the correct basis on which to proceed is to take into account the due proportion of the proceeds which the… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:17 am by sally
Regina v Majeed; Regina v Westfield [2012] EWCA Crim 1186; [2012] WLR (D) 172 “Where a sportsman corruptly accepted financial inducements to identify, in advance, occasions when during a match he would play in a specific, previously agreed, manner, the conduct of that sportsman, whose contract obliged him to refrain from doing anything that might damage the reputation of the club or board which employed him, was integral to the affairs and business of that club or board, who were… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:43 am by sally
Regina v McKenzie [2011] EWCA Crim 1550; [2011] WLR (D) 207 “Where the counts in an indictment referred to offences contrary to a specific statutory provision but the particulars referred to acts which would be contrary to a different statutory provision, findings of a jury could not be upheld on the basis that the requirements of section 4A(2)(b) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 were met, or that the defects could be cured by application of section 3 of the Criminal… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:04 am by sally
Regina v C(S) [2012] EWCA Crim 6; [2012] WLR (D) 5 “At a retrial of a conspirator about whom the jury at the first trial had been unable to reach a verdict, the Crown would be entitled to tell the jury that it was the prosecution’s case that those who had been acquitted at the first trial were probably involved in the conspiracy and that the jury would be entitled to take into account the acquitted conspirators’ probable role in the importation when deciding whether they… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:25 am by sally
Regina v Newell [2012] EWCA Crim 650; [2012] WLR (D) 105 “A statement made on a plea and case management hearing form by the defendant’s counsel, although admissible in principle as a matter of law, should not, in the exercise of the court’s discretion under section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (‘PACE’), be admitted in evidence against the defendant at trial, provided that the case had been conducted in accordance with the letter and the… [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:00 am
[MSNBC] * Crim Law Day 1: the death penalty and deterrence. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:23 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Supreme Court issued three opinions this morning, none in criminal cases. [read post]